Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle

Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle (2003)

55%
3259votes
5popularity
106min

"This summer the Angels are back."
WebSite:https://www.sonypictures.com/movies/charliesangelsfullthrottle
Budget:$120,000,000
Revenue:$259,175,788
Release:6/25/2003
Genres:Action | Adventure | Comedy
Original language:English
Spoken languages:English | Mandarin | Spanish
Countries:United States of America

Overview:

The Angels are charged with finding a pair of missing rings that are encoded with the personal information of members of the Witness Protection Program. As informants are killed, the ladies target a rogue agent who might be responsible.… Expand

Production companies:

Wonderland Sound and Vision
United States of America
Tall Trees Productions
United States of America
Flower Films
United States of America
Columbia Pictures
United States of America

Cast

Cast

Videos

Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle - Trailer
4/23/2013Trailer

Videos

Recommendations

Movie
2000
59%
Charlie's Angels
Movie
2019
64%
Charlie's Angels
Movie
2025
64%
Back in Action
Movie
2020
69%
My Spy
Movie
2005
65%
D.E.B.S.
Movie
1985
63%
Remo Williams: The Adventure Begins
Movie
1943
62%
Batman
Movie
2021
72%
Black Widow
Movie
2018
63%
Johnny English Strikes Again
Movie
2015
71%
The Man from U.N.C.L.E.
Movie
2000
61%
Mission: Impossible II
Movie
2024
65%
My Spy The Eternal City
Movie
2021
63%
The Serpent
Movie
2003
63%
Johnny English
Movie
2015
60%
Point Break
Movie
2022
62%
Sniper: Rogue Mission
Movie
2010
67%
RED
Movie
1990
61%
My Blue Heaven
Movie
2023
67%
Heart of Stone
Movie
1966
60%
The Silencers

Recommendations

Reviews

40%
JPV852
- Created:10/23/2019
- Updated:6/23/2021
Really poor sequel that has outlandish action scenes and lame jokes. If there's such a thing as a movie that epitomizes the early 2000s, this is it. Maybe it's my older age, but the T&A aspect holds little weight anymore. **1.75/5**… Expand
40%
The Movie Diorama
themoviediorama
- Created:1/16/2020
- Updated:6/23/2021
Charlie’s Angels Full Throttle fully accelerates whilst narratively stuck in second gear. Can I order a McG sandwich please? Huh? You have no filling? Sure, I’ll just take the overly stylised sauce. My personal adoration for this sequel’s predecessor is one that cannot be described fully without tackling the realms of lunacy and diminishing my own critical insight. It’s just a special piece of camp nostalgia for me, even if its construction is more amateurish than Diaz’ dance moves. Interestingly, this continuation was also on repeat as I galloped around the room to the soundtrack of The Prodigy and The Chemical Brothers, witnessing physically impossible aerobatic stunts. However, after all these years, it’s time to succumb to the realisation that Full Throttle is a bad film. Much like the first feature, its plot is a secondary product to the outlandish femme fatale antics. This time the angels must secure two H.A.L.O. rings which probably has something to do with monetisation and greed. Don’t ask me! For I honestly do not know. A stationery Barrymore sliding fully under a low table without the use of her arms had me entranced. Liu leaping sixty feet into the air by just jumping off a table had me hypnotised. And of course, Diaz bopping to MC Hammer’s “U Can’t Touch This” had me salivating. These, including the last point (have you tried side stepping that rapidly!?), are physically impossible to perform. The wired stunts and choreography are so exaggerated that it becomes laughably terrible, juxtaposing the semi-realistic narrative that McG is attempting to convey. Driving off a dam whilst trying to fly into a helicopter and take off (all in mid-air by the way...) before it crashes? Sure. Why not. Performing motocross stunts whilst upside down and shooting the angels? Eh. I’ll let it slide. Using a lace cape as a squirrel suit, throwing a bomb into a film premiere and perfectly landing in a car whilst being pursed by the angels who are hanging onto illuminated wires? Ummm. I guess. Being tossed through a shop window, like a rag doll, and walking it off before getting changed for the premiere? Now wait just a minute! Heightened stunts and ‘Matrix’-styled slow motion is all fine and dandy, but I need an ounce of realism in order to feel threatened by the danger on screen. The angels are invulnerable to everything, making the entire ordeal worthless. Yes, using a flamethrower to “Firestarter” is bonafide brilliance and shaped me to be the man that I am today. Yet the random action set pieces (to which there are loads!) cannot justify the narrative’s direction. Again, frustrating considering the onscreen chemistry of Diaz, Barrymore and Liu. The one and only Demi Moore is used for an underdeveloped plot twist, as she suggestively licks Diaz’ face. Oh, and Bernie Mac replaced Murray. A fine replacement, but again, under-utilised. Let’s not even discuss Theroux’s insulting Irish accent. The technical aspects, especially the garish green screen and floaty human CGI, unintentionally adds characteristics to the film in general, yet still executed terribly. And the callback “humour”, mostly consisting of the “creepy thin man” and the angels’ relationship, were cringeworthy at best. Although, the ongoing innuendos between Alex and her father did make me chuckle continuously. Is it enough to substantiate a sequel that showcases the apparent curse of “more is better”? Absolutely not. Whilst the heart of Charlie’s Angels resides within, its discombobulated exterior diminished most of the heavenly fun to be had.… Expand
70%
Andre Gonzales
SoSmooth1982
- Created:5/4/2023
- Updated:5/4/2023
Not as good as the 1st. It was still pretty funny. The sexy trio's fight scenes were a little better in this one.… Expand
60%
CinemaSerf
Geronimo1967
- Created:2/3/2025
- Updated:2/3/2025
If you had a whole collection of secret information why would you keep it all in one place and put it all on something as easily stolen as a ring? That's what's happened here only there are two rings and they contain all the details of the folks on the witness protection scheme. When they both fall into dangerously unscrupulous hands, and the body count starts to mount up, it falls to the lithe "Natalie" (Cameron Diaz), "Alex" (Lucy Liu) and "Dylan" (Drew Barrymore) to fly into action and save the day. Bill Murray decided to sit this one out, but luckily there's a "Jimmy Bosley" (Bernie Mac) there to keep them all co-ordinated and to hone in on their prime suspect. She's a former angel, herself, only this time "Madison" (Demi Moore) is not in a forgiving vein. It's all fairly standard action fayre that's largely the same as the last one from three years ago. There's a decent dynamic between the three women but the slo-motion action scenes, pyrotechnics and pretty banal dialogue don't really do it any favours as it lumbers along predictably. There's the usual soupçon of glittering faces to top it up, and a small slice of menace from both Robert Patrick and from the star of the film for me - Crispin Glover as the "Thin Man" or maybe that's "Thin Men". I still miss Kate Duncan's "Sabrina" and the more investigative nature of these mysteries. This is all just too blandly kick-ass and attitudinal for me providing nothing really new. It passes the time easily enough but you'll never remember it.… Expand

Filmoteka

Charlie's Angels: Full Throttle (2003)

Cast

Cast

Videos

Videos

Recommendations

Recommendations

Reviews

Reviews

Videos

Reviews

Recommendations